But you have to show that this cannot be accepted in any way.Īnd then what might happen? Petraeus didn’t speculate further or expand upon his alarming hypothetical. You don’t want to, again, get into a nuclear escalation here. But it doesn’t expand, it doesn’t - it’s not nuclear for nuclear. The other case is that this is so horrific that there has to be a response, it cannot go unanswered. Karl: The radiation would extend into NATO countries, it effectively would be an attack on NATO. and NATO response to something that is absolutely … Petraeus: Not an Article 5 because they’re not part of NATO - it would be a U.S. Karl: So it would bring America and NATO into the war? I mean - it would be an Article 5 situation basically. Petraeus: I mean, just to give you a hypothetical, we would respond by leading a NATO, a collective effort, that would take out every Russian conventional force that we can see and identify on the battlefield in Ukraine and also in Crimea and every ship in the Black Sea … Appearing on ABC’s This Week last Sunday, Petraeus said that if Russia used nuclear weapons in Ukraine, America would lead a devastating NATO response. How might Russia’s invasion of Ukraine - already a humanitarian, economic, and geopolitical crisis - turn into something much worse? Helpfully, I suppose, former CIA Director and US Army General David Petraeus has sketched us an outline.
Global nuclear war as portrayed in Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
0 kommentar(er)
